Shortlisting for all specialties will be carried out in mainly the same way, the key difference being whether that specialty is assessing commitment to specialty as part of the application scoring process:
- Using your application self-assessment
- Verifying your achievements and re-scoring your application
- Giving an organisation/evidence of thoroughness score for your evidence
- Depending on the specialty, marking your commitment to specialty score and assessing if you meet the minimum commitment standards for the specialty
- Using your priority status and the total score awarded to your application to invite to interview in score order.
There is not a set minimum score required, other than for commitment to specialty, and a specialty will invite eligible candidates to interview in accordance with their interview capacity.
To view the scores awarded to all submitted applications, including average scores and distribution nationally, for previous years please visit the relevant specialty's page.
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act
Shortlisting is the first stage where your priority status will be taken into account. Details of the criteria to be given priority status can be found on the Medical Training Recruitment website. Whilst applicants with priority status will be considered before those without, they still need to meet minimum requirements of the process, such as loading sufficiently well organised evidence to support self-assessment scoring and, should a specialty assess it in shortlisting, demonstrating satisfactory commitment to specialty.
It is not possible to advise on the likelihood that candidates without priority status will be shortlisted. Data on the impact of prioritisation in 2026 recruitment will be published to the
Medical Training Recruitment website for national round 2 (Round 1 of physician higher specialty training). This will detail the application numbers and percentage that had priority status. Please note that, prioritisation was not applied to the shortlisting stage in 2026 and, whilst previous application numbers may provide useful context, they should not be regarded as a reliable predictor of future application levels or shortlisting outcomes.
Timing of shortlisting
This will vary by specialty and we are not able to confirm exactly when each will be completed. The sequence of events for the shortlisting process will be:
- Loading evidence to the evidence portal - the dates which it is anticipated you will be asked to load your evidence for verification are published in each specialties 'Interview dates & posts' section of their page.
- Evidence verification - your evidence will be checked and scores verified at some point after the evidence loading deadline.
- Feedback and appeals - you will be sent your verified scores and given a short window (usually 72 hours) to appeal if you disagree with any of the verified scores. At this point any candidate found to be not appointable based on their commitment to specialty (for specialties assessing this at shortlisting) or issues with their evidence content or organisation will be notified; appeals are not permissible in these circumstances.
- Appeal review - appeals will be reviewed by a clinical lead whose decision is final. Please note that appealed scores can be reduced as well as increased and should a clinical lead find an issue with scoring for a domain that was not appealed, this could also be adjusted. Outcomes of appeals will be confirmed to applicants. In cases where an applicant's score is too far from the interview capacity cut-off to make a difference to the chances of being shortlisted, appeals may not be reviewed by a clinical lead.
- Shortlisting processed and outcomes confirmed - you will be emailed confirming if you have been shortlisted and will be invited to interview, are on a reserve list or have not been successful on this occasion; this will usually be no later than seven days prior to the first interview date for that specialty.
Reserve list candidates will be subsequently invited if places become available due to higher scoring candidates withdrawing their application.
There are a few exceptions to the timing noted above.
Specialties with capacity to interview all
If a specialty can interview all who apply, in some cases they may choose to do evidence verification after shortlisting, and in some cases after interview. Whilst the application score will not be needed for shortlisting, a proportion of the score is used in the total score used for ranking and offers, so the verification will be completed before this.
Specialties with applications far exceeding interview capacity
If a specialty has a significantly greater number of applications than their interview capacity, they may choose to shortlist out candidates whose self-assessment score is too far away from the interview capacity cut off to have a chance of being shortlisted. Where this is the case, the specialty will withdraw candidates at an early stage, usually soon after applications close once numbers can be assessed against capacity.
Applications shortlisted out on this basis will only look at the self-assessment score and will not factor in commitment to specialty, should that specialty assess it as part of their normal shortlisting process.